GSX Concerned Citizens Coalition
Comment on BC Hydro's announcement that the VIGP application
to BC Utilities Commission is deferred.
January 16, 2003
Energy and Mines Minister Richard Neufeld confirmed a few times in December
that BC Hydro would submit an application to the BC Utilities Commission (BCUC)
for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) for the proposed
Vancouver Island Generation Project (VIGP).
But he always made those statements with the qualifier that if VIGP were
sold to an Independent Power Producer (IPP), then BCUC would
not review the project.
Having been thwarted for three years now with the lack of candour from BC
Hydro, GSX Concerned Citizens Coaltion (GSXCCC) have been concerned that a way would be found to avoid subjecting VIGP
to a BCUC assessment.
There are two possibilities with this news release from BC Hydro. One
is, that they are cooking up an arrangement to circumvent a BCUC review of
VIGP. The other, the brighter possibility, is that these new
power proposals will provide BC Hydro a way to put VIGP gracefully. Unfortunately, the news
release appears to kill this possibility in its last paragraph: "When BC
Hydro moves forward with VIGP, it will submit an application to the BCUC for a
CPCN".
GSXCCC have filed evidence with
the National Energy Board, that demonstrates that the power from VIGP is not
necessary to meet peak demand on Vancouver Island until at least 2007, giving us
time to discuss and plan for more sustainable energy solutions than Hydro is
presently able to envision.
Notwithstanding this evidence, if BC Hydro is discovering sources of power that do not require
VIGP, then on the face of it, this is probably a good thing. An
alternative that involves burning coal or used tires, however, will face
strong opposition.
If, on the other hand, they are concocting a deal whereby an
IPP takes over VIGP, we would want to examine that deal closely. A private
investor will be interested in VIGP if two things are guaranteed them: 1. all
regulatory barriers are out of the way, and 2. the return on investment is assured. That is, BC
Hydro would have to guarantee a supply of gas, and commit to buying the
power.
In the end, one way or another all the economic risks of VIGP would be
underwritted by BC Hydro, and that means that we, the electricity users of
British Columbia, would be picking up the tab. This is no alternative,
it's just a deceit.
The NEB's Short Term Deliverability Report, published in December 2002, makes it
abundantly clear that the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin is moving into an
era of declining production. GSX and VIGP would enter a marketplace as a
very small player bidding against much bigger competitors for the remaining
gas.
For more information, please contact
GSX Concerned Citizens Coalition
Arthur Caldicott, 250-743-5551, arthurcaldicott@highspeedplus.com
Tom Hackney, 250-381-4463, thackney@island.net
---END---