By ALLISON
DUNFIELD
Globe and Mail Update
December 10, 2002
The long-awaited conclusion to a chapter in Canada's role in
the Kyoto protocol came Tuesday when the House of Commons voted in
favour of ratifying the deal.
With the support of the NDP and the Bloc Québécois, the Prime
Minister's wish to have Parliament ratify the agreement to slash
greenhouse gas emissions by Christmas looks as thought it will
likely come true.
The vote passed 195 to 77.
Focus
shifts to Kyoto implementation
See also our backgrounder
on the Kyoto Protocol
There had been little doubt that the Kyoto would not pass
because Prime Minister Jean Chrétien had indicated that it was
considered a confidence motion — meaning all Liberal MPs are
required to vote in favour of it or risk consequences.
However, around a dozen Liberal MPs did not attend the vote.
Backbench MP Roger Galloway, from Sarnia, Ont., announced
earlier Tuesday he would abstain from the vote because he said he
cannot support a deal which could possibly be harmful to Sarnia's
petrochemical industry.
Paul Martin, who had earlier been anticipated to vote against
the ratification because he feels there needs to be more debate on
the matter, voted alongside the government.
But he said Tuesday that he hopes that the Liberals will
proceed quickly with the implementation of the plan so that the
provinces can be assured that none of them will be unduly harmed
by the agreement.
Alberta Liberal MP Anne McLellan also voted with the agreement.
She has said she has fears that her province may be compromised by
the protocol because it may harm industry.
As anticipated, the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive
Conservatives voted against the deal.
The two parties are concerned that the economic impact
requiring industries to reduce harmful emissions will be dramatic.
Before the ratification vote, the Commons also voted down a
Canadian Alliance subamendment from the Canadian Alliance asking
that the government not implement the protocol until it can
establish all of the costs involved.
Meanwhile Tuesday, an umbrella of 40 Canadian business groups
called the Canadian Coalition for Responsible Environmental
Solutions said Tuesday's vote on the motion to ratify the Kyoto
Protocol leaves many questions unanswered.
"By ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, the government has
decided to commit Canadians without the benefit of a detailed game
plan or any clear sense of the cost to the country," Nancy
Hughes Anthony, president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and
a coalition member, said in a news release.
"Ratification does not end the uncertainty for Canadian
business, consumers or investors."
Perrin Beatty, president of the Canadian Manufacturers and
Exporters, called on the federal government to work
collaboratively with the provinces and industry to ensure that the
economy is not damaged.
"As we move forward, the federal government must focus on
creating a collaborative process that will allow us to deal with
climate change without inflicting serious damage on our economy or
exacerbating the regional divisions within Canada," Mr.
Beatty said in a news release.
Greenpeace Canada congratulated the House of Commons on its
vote Tuesday.
"This is a proud day for Canada, the federal government,
and Greenpeace, who has been pushing for Kyoto ratification for
several years," Steven Guilbeault, climate campaigner for
Greenpeace, said in a news release.
"Kyoto will lead to greater efficiency in our homes, our
transportation systems, and our economy in general."
Greenpeace cautioned that the implementation plan not be too
lenient on industrial polluters.
"Big industrial emitters represent more than 50 per cent
of our domestic emissions," Mr. Guilbeault said. "It is
unreasonable to make individual consumers pay for their
pollution."
The Kyoto accord would require Canadian businesses to reduce
emissions by 55 megatonnes, or 23 per cent of this country's
240-megatonne target for reductions, at a cost of billions of
dollars. Critics say this will place Canada at a competitive
disadvantage to the United States, which has rejected the treaty.
With reports from Allison Lawlor
|