![]() |
![]() |
Opposition to Upper Pitt power project closes public meetingCOMMENT: As noted here, "The Upper Pitt River Water Power Project would include seven small run-of-river hydro-electric components and send a powerline through Pinecone-Burke Provincial Park near Pitt Lake." We have long maintained that parks are not places to simply park land until someone has a more profitable use for it. Parks are not places that should be subordinated, annexed, or chopped up in the service of the province's energy plans. The government accepted the application for water rights fully aware that a transmission line through the park would be necessary. Subsequently, it issued guidelines on how to go about applying for parkland for transmission lines. Power-full meeting cancelled by attendanceCKNW Feb, 28 2008 PITT MEADOWS/CKNW(AM980) - A proposed power project near Pitt Meadows cutting through a provincial park brought out plenty of opposition at a public meeting Thursday evening. Too many, in fact. The Upper Pitt River Water Power Project would include seven small run-of-river hydro-electric components and send a powerline through Pinecone-Burke Provincial Park near Pitt Lake. But, hundreds of people packed a public meeting to oppose the plan because of environmental and First Nations concerns. So many, the Fire Marshall was called in and the meeting was shut down. The company behind the project, Northwest-Cascade Power, promises to schedule another meeting. Communities rally against IPPLaura Hendrick Squamish Chief February 29, 2008
The run-of-river company has proposed an Independent Power Project (IPP) on the Upper Pitt River. They have applied to change the boundaries of Pinecone Park to accommodate a transmission line, which would cross over 4.7 kilometres of its northern tip to connect with the Cheekye Substation north of Squamish. The room of about 60 people broke out in cheers each time someone spoke against the proposal and questions quickly escalated to attacks on the B.C. government. While some said decent citizens would never propose such a project, much of the criticism hit parks staff rather than the proponent. “I don’t have a single question for this private company whose job it is to make a profit,” said Joe Foy of the Western Canada Wilderness Committee. “I see no information from BC Parks that helps me separate the bull**t from the truth from this company.” “Where’s your display fighting for the park?” asked Ehor Boyanowsky, adding that park staff seemed to have resigned themselves to being apologists rather than advocates. BC Parks Planner Brett Hudson said he was required to consider any proposal to change a park boundary, adding that any change would require legislature approval. The change would also have to be in the public’s interest. According to company president Jako Krushnisky, the project could create enough electricity to power 55,700 homes, adding more renewable energy to the Hydro grid. He said building a transmission line across park is only being considered because there is no other options. Studies have shown the area has seasonal wildlife use by mountain goats and grizzly bears. It is composed of old growth forest, wetlands and grass meadows. “The old growth... we’ve tried to avoid them as best we can,” said project spokesperson Russ Tyson. When asked why the open houses were not scheduled for Vancouver and Coquitlam where the push had originally come to create Pinecone Burke Provincial Park in 1996, Hudson said the proponent chooses meeting locations. He said open houses could be scheduled for the city if “amenable” to the proponent. “...the private company that wants to wreck our park gets to choose where those meeting are and aren’t,” said Foy. The project is in the early stages of the Environmental Assessment Process. The public is invited to comment on the proposed draft Terms of Reference on the EAO website until April 8. Posted by Arthur Caldicott on 03 Mar 2008 |